Is it stable? ...

last rev 50e4dd43dfc7abe4c0e9 someone stability tests?

Since 50e4dd43dfc7abe4c0e9 is under 3h old it’s quite hard to say if it’s stable no?

I got 2 days of uptime with 660892d53e48 (10968) but c4cac049b4eff3b933d2121ccabf80012f5e90fd and > crashes after few seconds…

hope this helps.

Online for 1 day, 14 hours, 2 minutes, 38 seconds

Max players this uptime session: 1000

Trinity Revision: 10935+ Database Version: TDB 335.11.36

only patch is AC1,

release hash: 77af7ba851b8

any news?

I got 2 days of uptime with 11039 but it crashed shortly after that (max 250 online).

I just restarted and updated my 11039 core having >2d of uptime with it only having freezes because CoS instance test patch.

Aokromes , many thanks on your continuous stable updates , the thing we need is

Online players :

Max online :

Hash of rev :

Number of rev :

db version :

patches applied :

if its not to much troubles.

maestro - many thanks , 1000 players is a great number for 1 day uptime.

TC>TrinityCore Rev: 0 Release Hash: (Unix, little-endian)

Online players: 857 (max: 1436)

Active connections: 875 (max: 1464) Queued connections: 0 (max: 0)

Server uptime: 1 Day(s) 2 Hour(s) 25 Minute(s) 48 Second(s).

Update time diff: 77.

db : TDB 335.11.36

patch : plenty(mainly skill and spell patches)

Hash : [FONT=Monaco]e5b4f8e84[/FONT][FONT=Monaco] ([/FONT][SIZE=12px][FONT=Monaco]Scripts/Icecrown Citadel: Implemented boss raid frames for Blood Prince Council[/FONT][/SIZE][SIZE=12px][FONT=Monaco])[/FONT][/SIZE]

[SIZE=10px]
[/SIZE]

[SIZE=10px]
[/SIZE]

[SIZE=10px][FONT=Arial]sorry i can’t determine what rev number, but at least i still remember the release hash.[/FONT][/SIZE]

[SIZE=10px]
[/SIZE]

[SIZE=10px]- faster loading.[/SIZE]

[SIZE=10px]- far better memory consumption.[/SIZE]

[SIZE=10px]
[/SIZE]

[SIZE=10px]
[/SIZE]

[SIZE=10px]two thumbs up to all dev.[/SIZE]

WorldCore Rev: 3145 Release Hash: Archive (Win64, little-endian)

Online players: 962 (max: 1502)

Active connections: 968 (max: 1591) Queued connections: 0 (max: 0)

Server uptime: 19 Hour(s) 11 Minute(s) 29 Second(s).

Update time diff: 63.

DB : TDB 335.11.36 + Own fixes/custom content

Patches :

-WG(wintergrasp) from devnull’s repo

-AC1

-PvPRank

-A lot of code optimizations/custom content.

TrinityCore merge: 59aa3b5650e8f07a39a1 (Restore unix build) (https://github.com/TrinityCore/TrinityCore/commit/59aa3b5650e8f07a39a1ef63baf0a8f5946e774d)

Some DB errors but it looks stable on this rev merge.

your first post is a stable update ? +1

btw this is actually for newbies, not production server admins.

because i can say that rev 99x is stable with 100k players , but without proof and it would still count because no proof of stability is requested due to people with small lan based servers not caring as much.

Saw only few DB errors last 24h.

http://pastebin.com/raw.php?i=ckDSgr0W

Aokromes, are you having any Aura::UpdateTargetMap, Aura::GetCaster, or AuraEffect::PeriodicTick crashes? I’m on 11041 and it’s a bloody mess. The issue tracker is full of aura-related crashes that appear similar, too.

http://www.trinitycore.org/t/trinitycore/ticket/96

http://www.trinitycore.org/t/trinitycore/ticket/95

http://www.trinitycore.org/t/trinitycore/ticket/110

new rev?

Trinity Revision: 11084+ ( 187f34248da2+ (Unix, little-endian))

Custom patches: AC1

Database Version: TDB 335.11.36

Online for 1 day, 11 hours, 36 minutes, 40 seconds

Max players this uptime session: 1009

and still counting…

TrinityCore Rev: 0 Release Hash: Archive (Unix, little-endian)

Online players: 400 (max: 1230)

Active connections: 409 (max: 1264) Queued connections: 0 (max: 0)

Server uptime: 14 Hour(s) 52 Minute(s) 25 Second(s) until i restarted to fix something.

Update time diff: 112.

Rev Hash : [FONT=Monaco]22c924[/FONT]

patch : AC , skill/spells patch.

Update : wrong rev hash.

That revision has only been live for 7 hours. How does your server have almost 15 hours of uptime on it?

sorry, that’s the one i applied today .

[SIZE=12px][FONT=verdana]
[/FONT][/SIZE]

actually the rev hash is this one : [FONT=Monaco]22c924[/FONT]

i think jonkopinx is not being truthful.

thanks anyway.