[SOLVED]Fresh install console messages

I’m getting the below messages in the console log. Are they normal or have i missed something? It was a completely fresh install and database/updates installed on auto. Plays fine as far as i can see.

I’m running Debian 8

TrinityCore rev. 224399958d68 2017-04-22 12:26:48 +0200 (3.3.5 branch) (Unix, Release, Static) (worldserver-daemon)

Generating spell proc data from SpellMap…
Spell Id 6940 has DBC ProcFlags 699048, but it’s of non-proc aura type, it probably needs an entry in spell_proc table to be handled correctly.
Spell Id 7366 has DBC ProcFlags 69972, but it’s of non-proc aura type, it probably needs an entry in spell_proc table to be handled correctly.
Spell Id 18499 has DBC ProcFlags 139944, but it’s of non-proc aura type, it probably needs an entry in spell_proc table to be handled correctly.
Spell Id 28313 has DBC ProcFlags 1581224, but it’s of non-proc aura type, it probably needs an entry in spell_proc table to be handled correctly.
Spell Id 32065 has DBC ProcFlags 262144, but it’s of non-proc aura type, it probably needs an entry in spell_proc table to be handled correctly.
Spell Id 33891 has DBC ProcFlags 174624, but it’s of non-proc aura type, it probably needs an entry in spell_proc table to be handled correctly.
Spell Id 35244 has DBC ProcFlags 262144, but it’s of non-proc aura type, it probably needs an entry in spell_proc table to be handled correctly.
Spell Id 36659 has DBC ProcFlags 262144, but it’s of non-proc aura type, it probably needs an entry in spell_proc table to be handled correctly.
Spell Id 40453 has DBC ProcFlags 1581224, but it’s of non-proc aura type, it probably needs an entry in spell_proc table to be handled correctly.
Spell Id 40879 has DBC ProcFlags 664096, but it’s of non-proc aura type, it probably needs an entry in spell_proc table to be handled correctly.
Spell Id 41341 has DBC ProcFlags 1747624, but it’s of non-proc aura type, it probably needs an entry in spell_proc table to be handled correctly.
Spell Id 44586 has DBC ProcFlags 697000, but it’s of non-proc aura type, it probably needs an entry in spell_proc table to be handled correctly.
Spell Id 45092 has DBC ProcFlags 664232, but it’s of non-proc aura type, it probably needs an entry in spell_proc table to be handled correctly.
Spell Id 49145 has DBC ProcFlags 131072, but it’s of non-proc aura type, it probably needs an entry in spell_proc table to be handled correctly.
Spell Id 50462 has DBC ProcFlags 131752, but it’s of non-proc aura type, it probably needs an entry in spell_proc table to be handled correctly.
Spell Id 50498 has DBC ProcFlags 16, but it’s of non-proc aura type, it probably needs an entry in spell_proc table to be handled correctly.
Spell Id 51809 has DBC ProcFlags 131752, but it’s of non-proc aura type, it probably needs an entry in spell_proc table to be handled correctly.
Spell Id 53032 has DBC ProcFlags 81936, but it’s of non-proc aura type, it probably needs an entry in spell_proc table to be handled correctly.
Spell Id 53578 has DBC ProcFlags 16, but it’s of non-proc aura type, it probably needs an entry in spell_proc table to be handled correctly.
Spell Id 53579 has DBC ProcFlags 16, but it’s of non-proc aura type, it probably needs an entry in spell_proc table to be handled correctly.
Spell Id 53580 has DBC ProcFlags 16, but it’s of non-proc aura type, it probably needs an entry in spell_proc table to be handled correctly.
Spell Id 53581 has DBC ProcFlags 16, but it’s of non-proc aura type, it probably needs an entry in spell_proc table to be handled correctly.
Spell Id 53582 has DBC ProcFlags 16, but it’s of non-proc aura type, it probably needs an entry in spell_proc table to be handled correctly.
Spell Id 62142 has DBC ProcFlags 69648, but it’s of non-proc aura type, it probably needs an entry in spell_proc table to be handled correctly.
Spell Id 64205 has DBC ProcFlags 699048, but it’s of non-proc aura type, it probably needs an entry in spell_proc table to be handled correctly.
Spell Id 66334 has DBC ProcFlags 245760, but it’s of non-proc aura type, it probably needs an entry in spell_proc table to be handled correctly.
Spell Id 67905 has DBC ProcFlags 245760, but it’s of non-proc aura type, it probably needs an entry in spell_proc table to be handled correctly.
Spell Id 67906 has DBC ProcFlags 245760, but it’s of non-proc aura type, it probably needs an entry in spell_proc table to be handled correctly.
Spell Id 67907 has DBC ProcFlags 245760, but it’s of non-proc aura type, it probably needs an entry in spell_proc table to be handled correctly.
Spell Id 72151 has DBC ProcFlags 69972, but it’s of non-proc aura type, it probably needs an entry in spell_proc table to be handled correctly.
Spell Id 72648 has DBC ProcFlags 69972, but it’s of non-proc aura type, it probably needs an entry in spell_proc table to be handled correctly.
Spell Id 72649 has DBC ProcFlags 69972, but it’s of non-proc aura type, it probably needs an entry in spell_proc table to be handled correctly.
Spell Id 72650 has DBC ProcFlags 69972, but it’s of non-proc aura type, it probably needs an entry in spell_proc table to be handled correctly.

“normal” known, they must be fixed, soon™

— Canned message start —
It appears the issue in the original post was solved, so this thread shall be closed.
Should you encounter any other difficulties, please open a new thread.
— Canned message end —